Segment
1. Firestone Firehawk Sport Upper-middle2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Firestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (69%) than Kumho (56%). But when it comes to comparing Firestone Firehawk Sport and Kumho Ecsta PS71, the rating is the same - 76%. The first tyre test of Firestone Firehawk Sport was done in 2023, compared to 2018 when was the Kumho Ecsta PS71 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2025 225/40 R18 test, where both the Firehawk Sport and the Ecsta PS71 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Firestone Firehawk Sport dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (72%) of the Kumho Ecsta PS71 also have A wet ratings. We also know where Firehawk Sport is made - Italy.
# | Firestone Firehawk Sport
| Kumho Ecsta PS71
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R18 - R20 | R16 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Firestone Firehawk Sport Upper-middle2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Highly recommended2. Firestone Firehawk Sport Very good
1. Firestone Firehawk Sport Satisfactory2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Conditionally recommended
Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,6 | 1,5 | |||||
Firestone Firehawk Sport Rating: Good | 3,2 | 2,0 | |||||
Kumho Ecsta PS71 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,0 | 2,9 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32.6 | 27.4 | |||||
Firestone Firehawk Sport | 34.6 | 31.1 | |||||
Kumho Ecsta PS71 | 34.2 | 27.4 | |||||
Show test details |