12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Firestone Destination HP vs. General Tire Grabber GT Plus vs. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Firestone Destination HP /0%	General Tire Grabber GT Plus /43%	Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 /0%

Dimensions	R15 - R20	R15 - R23
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 Premium

2. Firestone Destination HP Upper-middle

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 64

2. Firestone Destination HP 35

3. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 0

Number of tests

1. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 5x

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 2x

3. Firestone Destination HP 1x

Best position in test

1. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 1.

2. Firestone Destination HP 3.

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 9.

Worst position in test

1. Firestone Destination HP 3.

2. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 3.

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 9.

Average position in tests

1. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 2

2. Firestone Destination HP 3

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 9

Year of the last test

1. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 2023

2. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 2018

3. Firestone Destination HP 2017

Best rating in test

1. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 Very good

2. Firestone Destination HP Good

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Firestone Destination HP Good

2. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 Recommended

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus Satisfactory

Wet

(Overall rating)

Goodyear
EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

87%

Firestone
Destination HP

73%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

67%

Wet braking

1. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 89%

2. Firestone Destination HP 80%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 80%

Wet circle cornering

1. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 79%

2. Firestone Destination HP 64%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 62%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Firestone Destination HP 78%

2. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 75%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 64%

Wet handling

1. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 99%

2. Firestone Destination HP 61%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 61%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 91%

2. Firestone Destination HP 83%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 68%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. General Tire Grabber GT Plus A

2. Firestone Destination HP B

3. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 ?

Comfort

(Overall rating)

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

72%

Firestone
Destination HP

72%

Goodyear
EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

52%

Exterior noise

1. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 72%

2. Firestone Destination HP 62%

3. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 52%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. General Tire Grabber GT Plus ?

2. Firestone Destination HP ?

3. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Firestone
Destination HP

95%

Goodyear
EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

84%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

63.5%

Costs

(Overall rating)

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

88%

Firestone
Destination HP

71%

Goodyear
EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

56%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. General Tire Grabber GT Plus C

2. Firestone Destination HP E

3. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 ?

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Comparison: Firestone Destination HP vs. General Tire Grabber GT Plus vs. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands