Segment
1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Premium2. Federal Evoluzion ST-1 Lowcost3. Nexen N fera Sport Lowcost4. Linglong Sport Master Lowcost5. Apollo Aspire XP Lowcost
Comparison: Federal Evoluzion ST-1 vs. Nexen N fera Sport vs. Vredestein Quatrac Pro vs. Linglong Sport Master vs. Apollo Aspire XP
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Apollo Aspire XP 8.56
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Exemplary2. Nexen N fera Sport Exemplary3. Apollo Aspire XP Exemplary4. Linglong Sport Master Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Apollo Aspire XP Good2. Nexen N fera Sport Satisfactory3. Linglong Sport Master Satisfactory4. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 58.1 | 24.8 | |||||
| Federal Evoluzion ST-1 | 65 | 29 | |||||
| Nexen N Fera Sport | 63.2 | 27.2 | |||||
| Linglong Sport Master | 60.2 | 25.8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Federal Evoluzion ST-1 | 35,3 | 39,4 | |||||
| Nexen N fera Sport | 33,2 | 30,9 | |||||
| Apollo Aspire XP | 34,7 | 30,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
