Segment
1. Continental EcoContact 6 Premium2. Falken Sincera SN110 Upper-middle3. Cooper CS7 Upper-middle
Comparison: Falken Sincera SN110 vs. Cooper CS7 vs. Continental EcoContact 6
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
3. Cooper CS7 15.
Worst position in test
2. Cooper CS7 15.
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental EcoContact 6 Satisfactory2. Cooper CS7 Satisfactory3. Falken Sincera SN110 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Continental EcoContact 6 Satisfactory2. Cooper CS7 Satisfactory3. Falken Sincera SN110 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
3. Cooper CS7 36%
Aquaplaning - cross
2. Cooper CS7 69%
Wet braking
3. Cooper CS7 58%
Wet circle cornering
2. Cooper CS7 78%
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
2. Cooper CS7 80%
Dry driving behavior
3. Cooper CS7 48%
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
3. Cooper CS7 78%
Interior noise
3. Cooper CS7 72%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Cooper CS7 70 dB
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,7 | 1,6 | 2,7 | 1 | 1,7 | ||
| Falken Sincera SN110 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,6 | 1,9 | 2,7 | 3,0 | 1,7 | ||
| Cooper CS7 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,2 | 3,2 | 3,0 | 3,0 | 1,9 | ||
| Continental EcoContact 6 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,6 | 2,4 | 3,0 | 2,5 | 1,8 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
