In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (92%) than Falken (70%). But when it comes to comparing Falken Sincera SN-832 Ecorun and Continental ContiPremiumContact 5, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Falken Sincera SN-832 Ecorun was done in 2018, compared to 2016 when was the Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2018 175/65 R14 test, where both the Sincera SN-832 Ecorun and the ContiPremiumContact 5 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Falken Sincera SN-832 Ecorun dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (57%) of the Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 also have A wet ratings.
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
| Organization | Season | Year | Dimension | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ADAC
|
Summer
|
2018 | 175/65 R14 | View |
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.