Segment
1. Falken Linam VAN01 Upper-middle2. Apollo Altrust Lowcost
Comparison: Falken Linam VAN01 vs. Apollo Altrust
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken) against a tyre from a manufacturer from India (Apollo). Generally, Falken summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Apollo (29%). But when it comes to comparing Falken Linam VAN01 and Apollo Altrust, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 215/65 R16 test, where both the Linam VAN01 and the Altrust were tested.
| # | Falken Linam VAN01
| Apollo Altrust
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R17 | R15 - R16 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Apollo Altrust Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Apollo Altrust Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Falken Linam VAN01 72 dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,8 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 0,5 | 1,7 | ||
| Falken Linam VAN01 Rating: Poor | 4,6 | 2,8 | 3,2 | 0,5 | 2,0 | ||
| Apollo Altrust Rating: Satisfactory | 2,8 | 2,1 | 2,9 | 2,5 | 2,4 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
