Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Premium2. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Premium3. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 Upper-middle4. Uniroyal SNOW MAX 2 Upper-middle5. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van Lowcost
1. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Premium2. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Premium3. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 Upper-middle4. Uniroyal SNOW MAX 2 Upper-middle5. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van Lowcost
1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Recommended2. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Conditionally recommended3. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 Conditionally recommended4. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van Conditionally recommended5. Uniroyal SNOW MAX 2 Conditionally recommended
1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Still recommended2. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Conditionally recommended3. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 Conditionally recommended4. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van Conditionally recommended5. Uniroyal SNOW MAX 2 Conditionally recommended
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
| Falken EuroWinter VAN01 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 3,3 | 3,2 | 4,0 | 2,3 | 2,6 | 2,0 | 1,8 |
| Uniroyal SNOW MAX 2 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 3,1 | 4,2 | 2,2 | 2,8 | 3,9 | 3,0 | 2,6 |
| Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 4,0 | 4,1 | 2,6 | 2,8 | 3,7 | 3,0 | 2,0 |
| Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van Rating: Conditionally recommended | 3,2 | 4,1 | 2,6 | 2,8 | 3,8 | 3,0 | 2,6 |
| Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Rating: Recommended | 2,9 | 3,4 | 2,5 | 2,4 | 3,2 | 2,0 | 2,0 |
| Show test details | |||||||