12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Falken EuroWinter VAN01 vs. Kumho PorTran CW51 vs. Continental VanContact Winter vs. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 vs. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Falken EuroWinter VAN01 /0%	Kumho PorTran CW51 /0%	Continental VanContact Winter /0%	Bridgestone Blizzak W810 /0%	Michelin AGILIS ALPIN /0%

Dimensions	R14 - R17	R14 - R17	R14 - R17	R14 - R17	R15 - R17
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Continental VanContact Winter Premium

2. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Premium

3. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Premium

4. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 Upper-middle

5. Kumho PorTran CW51 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 56

2. Continental VanContact Winter 46

3. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 32

4. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 23

5. Kumho PorTran CW51 21

Number of tests

1. Continental VanContact Winter 2x

2. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 2x

3. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 1x

4. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 1x

5. Kumho PorTran CW51 1x

Best position in test

1. Continental VanContact Winter 1.

2. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 3.

3. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 6.

4. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 7.

5. Kumho PorTran CW51 8.

Worst position in test

1. Continental VanContact Winter 1.

2. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 3.

3. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 6.

4. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 7.

5. Kumho PorTran CW51 8.

Average position in tests

1. Continental VanContact Winter 1

2. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 3

3. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 6

4. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 7

5. Kumho PorTran CW51 8

Year of the last test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 2019

2. Continental VanContact Winter 2019

3. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 2019

4. Kumho PorTran CW51 2019

5. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 2019

Best rating in test

1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Recommended

2. Continental VanContact Winter Recommended

3. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Conditionally recommended

4. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 Conditionally recommended

5. Kumho PorTran CW51 Conditionally recommended

Worst rating in test

1. Continental VanContact Winter Recommended

2. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Still recommended

3. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Conditionally recommended

4. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 Conditionally recommended

5. Kumho PorTran CW51 Conditionally recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

Continental
VanContact Winter

86%

Michelin
AGILIS ALPIN

67%

Falken
EuroWinter VAN01

66%

Kumho
PorTran CW51

64%

Bridgestone
Blizzak W810

55%

Wet handling

1. Continental VanContact Winter 95%

2. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 69%

3. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 57%

4. Kumho PorTran CW51 46%

5. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 34%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Kumho PorTran CW51 78%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 78%

3. Continental VanContact Winter 74%

4. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 67%

5. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 67%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Continental VanContact Winter 81%

2. Kumho PorTran CW51 78%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 67%

4. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 67%

5. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 59%

Wet braking

1. Continental VanContact Winter 94%

2. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 75%

3. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 71%

4. Kumho PorTran CW51 49%

5. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 40%

Wet circle cornering

1. Continental VanContact Winter 92%

2. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 72%

3. Kumho PorTran CW51 72%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 61%

5. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 61%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Continental VanContact Winter B

2. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN B

3. Kumho PorTran CW51 C

4. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 C

5. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Continental
VanContact Winter

82%

Falken
EuroWinter VAN01

68%

Michelin
AGILIS ALPIN

59%

Kumho
PorTran CW51

49%

Bridgestone
Blizzak W810

49%

Dry braking

1. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 89%

2. Kumho PorTran CW51 78%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 78%

4. Continental VanContact Winter 72%

5. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 61%

Snow

(Overall rating)

Michelin
AGILIS ALPIN

84%

Continental
VanContact Winter

83%

Bridgestone
Blizzak W810

79%

Kumho
PorTran CW51

70%

Falken
EuroWinter VAN01

48%

Snow handling

1. Continental VanContact Winter 82%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 76%

3. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 74%

4. Kumho PorTran CW51 60%

5. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 40%

Snow traction

1. Continental VanContact Winter 92%

2. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 92%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 83%

4. Kumho PorTran CW51 72%

5. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 50%

Snow braking

1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 89%

2. Continental VanContact Winter 84%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 78%

4. Kumho PorTran CW51 78%

5. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 56%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Falken
EuroWinter VAN01

81%

Michelin
AGILIS ALPIN

75%

Continental
VanContact Winter

71%

Kumho
PorTran CW51

71%

Bridgestone
Blizzak W810

56%

Exterior noise

1. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 91%

2. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 81%

3. Kumho PorTran CW51 71%

4. Continental VanContact Winter 65%

5. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 44%

Interior noise

1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 77%

2. Continental VanContact Winter 77%

3. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 71%

4. Kumho PorTran CW51 71%

5. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 67%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 75 dB

2. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN ?

3. Continental VanContact Winter ?

4. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 ?

5. Kumho PorTran CW51 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Falken
EuroWinter VAN01

89%

Michelin
AGILIS ALPIN

87%

Bridgestone
Blizzak W810

76%

Kumho
PorTran CW51

76%

Continental
VanContact Winter

74%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Continental VanContact Winter C

2. Kumho PorTran CW51 D

3. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN E

4. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 E

5. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Falken
EuroWinter VAN01

86%

Michelin
AGILIS ALPIN

84%

Kumho
PorTran CW51

78%

Continental
VanContact Winter

74%

Bridgestone
Blizzak W810

74%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

ADAC Winter tyre test 2019 205/65 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	2,4	2,3	2,2	2,3	2,5	2,0	1,6
Falken EuroWinter VAN01 Rating: Conditionally recommended	3,3	3,2	4,0	2,3	2,6	2,0	1,8
Kumho PorTran CW51 Rating: Conditionally recommended	3,6	4,1	3,0	2,6	3,0	3,0	2,0
Continental VanContact Winter Rating: Recommended	2,4	2,3	2,7	2,8	3,1	3,0	2,2
Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Rating: Conditionally recommended	4,0	4,1	2,6	2,8	3,7	3,0	2,0
Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Rating: Recommended	2,9	3,4	2,5	2,4	3,2	2,0	2,0
Show test details

Comparison: Falken EuroWinter VAN01 vs. Kumho PorTran CW51 vs. Continental VanContact Winter vs. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 vs. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands