Comparison: Falken EuroWinter VAN01 vs. Kumho PorTran CW51
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Kumho winter tyres are slightly better rated (63%) than Falken (58%). But when it comes to comparing Falken EuroWinter VAN01 and Kumho PorTran CW51, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the EuroWinter VAN01 and the PorTran CW51 were tested.
Great news! We found mutual test data
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Mutual tests overview
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
Tests used in comparison (1)
| Organization | Season | Year | Dimension | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ADAC
|
Winter
|
2019 | 205/65 R16 | View |
Performance comparison
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
Kumho PorTran CW51
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
Kumho PorTran CW51
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
Kumho PorTran CW51
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
Kumho PorTran CW51
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
Kumho PorTran CW51
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
Kumho PorTran CW51
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
Kumho PorTran CW51
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
Kumho PorTran CW51
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
Kumho PorTran CW51
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
Kumho PorTran CW51
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
Kumho PorTran CW51
Performance spider chart
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Dimensions and prices
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.
