In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from Japan. Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (87%) than Falken (58%). But when it comes to comparing Falken EuroWinter VAN01 and Bridgestone Blizzak W810, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the EuroWinter VAN01 and the Blizzak W810 were tested.
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
| Organization | Season | Year | Dimension | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ADAC
|
Winter
|
2019 | 205/65 R16 | View |
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.