In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Falken (58%). In this particular case, the Nokian Snowproof 2 has a better rating of 69% compared to 65% of the Falken EuroWinter HS02. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the EuroWinter HS02 and the Snowproof 2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Falken EuroWinter HS02 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Nokian Snowproof 2 also have B wet ratings. We also know where EuroWinter HS02 is made - Turkey.
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
| Organization | Season | Year | Dimension | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ADAC
|
Winter
|
2024 | 205/55 R16 | View |
Falken EuroWinter HS02
Nokian Snowproof 2
Falken EuroWinter HS02
Nokian Snowproof 2
Falken EuroWinter HS02
Nokian Snowproof 2
Falken EuroWinter HS02
Nokian Snowproof 2
Falken EuroWinter HS02
Nokian Snowproof 2
Falken EuroWinter HS02
Nokian Snowproof 2
Falken EuroWinter HS02
Nokian Snowproof 2
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.