Segment
1. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Upper-middle2. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (GT). Generally, Falken winter tyres are slightly better rated (58%) than GT (50%). In this particular case, the Falken EuroWinter HS02 has a better rating of 65% compared to 61% of the GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo. The first tyre test of Falken EuroWinter HS02 was done in 2023, compared to 2024 when was the GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the EuroWinter HS02 and the Radial Winter Pro 2 evo were tested. See more mutual tests below. We also know where EuroWinter HS02 is made - Turkey.
| # | Falken EuroWinter HS02
| GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R21 | R13 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Upper-middle2. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Lowcost
1. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Satisfactory2. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Satisfactory
1. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Satisfactory2. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Sufficient
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Winter | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1.6 | 1.9 | 2.0 | 2.3 | 2.9 | 1.7 | 2.0 |
| Falken Eurowinter HS02 Rating: Satisfactory | 2.7 | 2.5 | 2.9 | 3.3 | 3.4 | 2.6 | 2.9 |
| GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Rating: Sufficient | 2.9 | 3.7 | 3.7 | 4.3 | 3.1 | 3.3 | 3.6 |
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
| Falken Eurowinter HS02 | 38.3 | 30.7 | |||||
| GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo | 36.0 | 29.3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||