Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 Premium2. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro Upper-middle
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from Japan. Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (93%) than Falken (58%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 has a better rating of 97% compared to 55% of the Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro. The first tyre test of Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro was done in 2023, compared to 2024 when was the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 245/45 R18 test, where both the EuroWinter HS02 Pro and the Blizzak 6 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 also have B wet ratings.
# | Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
| Bridgestone Blizzak 6
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R16 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 Premium2. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro Upper-middle
1. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 Exemplary2. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro Satisfactory
1. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro Conditionally recommended
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 2- | ||||
Bridgestone Blizzak 6 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2 | 2+ | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Enviromental impact | Running costs | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 7.3 | 7.3 | 6.4 | 7.0 | 6.0 | ||
Falken Eurowinter HS02 Pro Rating: Good | 7.5 | 7.3 | 7.5 | 7.7 | 7.0 | ||
Bridgestone Blizzak 6 Rating: Very good | 9.2 | 9.0 | 9.4 | 7.7 | 6.5 | ||
Show test details |