18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Falken EuroWinter HS01 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental winter tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than Falken (58%). The first tyre test of Falken EuroWinter HS01 was done in 2017, compared to 2021 when was the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the EuroWinter HS01 and the WinterContact TS 870 P were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 75% of Falken EuroWinter HS01 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (98%) of the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P also have B wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the EuroWinter HS01 is made in Turkey and WinterContact TS 870 P is made in Czech Republic.

#	Falken EuroWinter HS01 /0%	Continental WinterContact TS 870 P /93%

Dimensions	R13 - R21	R16 - R22
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Premium

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 359

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 178

Number of tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 29x

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 23x

Best position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 1.

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 5.

Worst position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 13.

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 30.

Average position in tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 3.66

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 11.04

Year of the last test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 2025

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 2022

Best rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Test winner

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Good

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Sufficient

Wet

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

79%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

78%

Wet braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 78%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 78%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 89%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 84%

Wet handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 84%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 80%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 92%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 70%

Wet circle cornering

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 84%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 61%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P B

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 B

Dry

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

89%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

83%

Dry braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 87%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 78%

Dry handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 85%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 83%

Snow

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

85%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

58%

Snow traction

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 83%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 59%

Snow braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 89%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 71%

Snow handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 86%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 64%

Snow cornering

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 83%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 67%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

81%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

75%

Exterior noise

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 83%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 70%

Comfort

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 74%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 69%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 ?

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

65%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

59%

Rolling resistance

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 93%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 44%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P C

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 D

Ice

(Overall rating)

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

75.8%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

0%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 4 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,8	25,4
Falken EuroWinter HS01	36,3	25,9
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P	34,6	25,5
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	2+	2+
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Good	2-	2-	2	2
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Rating: Good	2+	2+	1-	3
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 245/40 R19

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	2+	2+	2+
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Good	2	2	2
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Rating: Exemplary	2	2	2+
Show test details

AutoMotorSport Winter tyre test 2022 245/45 R19

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	9,3	9,4	10	10	10
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Sufficient	8,3	8,2	4,3	4	6
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Rating: Very good	7,5	9,4	8,3	10	8
Show test details

Comparison: Falken EuroWinter HS01 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands