12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Falken EuroWinter HS01 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Falken EuroWinter HS01 /0%	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 /82%	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /81%	Fulda Kristall Control HP2 /64%	Continental WinterContact TS 870 P /93%

Dimensions	R13 - R21	R14 - R22	R14 - R19	R15 - R19	R16 - R22
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Premium

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Upper-middle

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

5. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 359

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 213

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 178

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

5. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 50

Number of tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 49x

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 29x

3. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 25x

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

5. Falken EuroWinter HS01 23x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 1.

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 1.

4. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 2.

5. Falken EuroWinter HS01 5.

Worst position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 13.

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 15.

4. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 23.

5. Falken EuroWinter HS01 30.

Average position in tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 3.2

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 3.66

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

4. Falken EuroWinter HS01 11.04

5. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 12.36

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 2025

3. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 2025

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 2024

5. Falken EuroWinter HS01 2022

Best rating in test

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Exemplary

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Test winner

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good

5. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Good

3. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Satisfactory

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended

5. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Sufficient

Wet

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

91%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

79%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

72%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

68%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

62%

Wet braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 94%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 78%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 75%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 65%

5. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 51%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 89%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 89%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 84%

4. Falken EuroWinter HS01 79%

5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 71%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 87%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 84%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 79%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 70%

5. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 63%

Wet handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 93%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 84%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 72%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

5. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 54%

Wet circle cornering

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 88%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 84%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 66%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 61%

5. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 53%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 A

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P B

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 B

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

5. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 B

Dry

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

89%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

83%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

72%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

71%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

59%

Dry braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 87%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 78%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 78%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 70%

5. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 56%

Dry handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 88%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 85%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 75%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 66%

5. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 61%

Dry lane changing

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 90%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 80%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 65%

4. Falken EuroWinter HS01 65%

5. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 0%

Dry steering response

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 85%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 85%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 78%

4. Falken EuroWinter HS01 70%

5. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 0%

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

95%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

85%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

82%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

71%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

66%

Snow traction

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 82%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 83%

4. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 81%

5. Falken EuroWinter HS01 66%

Snow braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 95%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 89%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 87%

4. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 79%

5. Falken EuroWinter HS01 77%

Snow handling

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 95%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 86%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 80%

4. Falken EuroWinter HS01 72%

5. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 51%

Snow cornering

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 90%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 87%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 83%

4. Falken EuroWinter HS01 78%

5. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 54%

Lateral guidance on snow

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 100%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 80%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 70%

4. Falken EuroWinter HS01 60%

5. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 0%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

83%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

81%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

78%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

78%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

73%

Exterior noise

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 86%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 83%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 77%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 75%

5. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 63%

Comfort

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 84%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 82%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 79%

5. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 69%

Interior noise

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 90%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 82%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 81%

4. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 0%

5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 0%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 72 dB

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P ?

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ?

4. Falken EuroWinter HS01 ?

5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

83%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

71%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

69%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

65%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

59%

Rolling resistance

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 93%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 84%

3. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 73%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 70%

5. Falken EuroWinter HS01 51%

Mileage

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 92%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 77%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 60%

5. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 50%

Price/value

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 84%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 72%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 58%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 54%

5. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 35%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 C

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 C

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P C

4. Falken EuroWinter HS01 D

5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

Ice

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

80%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80.5%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

79%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

71.4%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

0%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 18 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,8	25,4
Falken EuroWinter HS01	36,3	25,9
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	32,8	26,3
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,8	25,4
Fulda Kristall Control HP2	36,8	26,3
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P	34,6	25,5
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	2+	2+
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Good	2-	2-	2	2
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good	1-	2+	2	3+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2-	2	1-	2
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Rating: Good	2+	2+	1-	3
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 245/40 R19

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	2+	2+	2+
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Good	2	2	2
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Exemplary	2+	2	2+
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Rating: Exemplary	2	2	2+
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2022 215/60 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Rolling resistance	Noise	Wear
Best values in test	2,0	1,8	1,4	1,8	1,5	2,7	1,5
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Satisfactory	2,3	3,5	2,0	2,2	2,5	2,7	2,5
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Satisfactory	2,0	1,8	2,7	2,4	2,1	3,4	2,5
Show test details

AutoMotorSport Winter tyre test 2022 245/45 R19

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	9,3	9,4	10	10	10
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Sufficient	8,3	8,2	4,3	4	6
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Very good	8,4	7,6	8,2	8	7
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Rating: Very good	7,5	9,4	8,3	10	8
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 225/45 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	2+	2+	1
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	2+
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good	2+	2+	2+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2	1
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Wear
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+	1
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2	3+	3+	2
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good	1-	2	1	2	2+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2	3+	1-	3+	2
Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	3+	2-	2	1
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2021 195/65 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear
Best values in test	1,6	1,9	1,9	2,0	2,6	2,0
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Satisfactory	2,7	2,3	2,4	2,4	2,9	3,0
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Satisfactory	1,7	2,5	2,8	2,3	3,3	3,0
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2,6	2,2	1,9	2,5	3,3	2,0
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,1	27,3
Falken EuroWinter HS01	36,2	29,5
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	32,1	28,1
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,6	27,9
Fulda Kristall Control HP2	36,8	28,6
Show test details

AutoMotorSport Winter tyre test 2021 195/55 R16

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	8,7	9,6	9,3	10	10	10
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Good	7,1	7,4	7,0	7,5	4	10
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Very good	8,7	9,6	8,6	8,2	8	7
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	7,8	6,6	7,4	10	5	9
Show test details

Autoexpress Winter tyre test 2020 205/55 R16

Name	Points total	Winter	Wet	Dry	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	101,6	299,9	299,9	100	101,1	100,7
Falken EuroWinter HS01	98	286,4	281,7	98,9	82,6	99,7
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	100	285,8	299,8	100	87,6	99,8
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2020 225/40 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	1-	2	1-
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Good	2+	2-	1-
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Exemplary	1-	2	1-
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	1-
Show test details

ACE Winter tyre test 2020 225/50 R17

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	200	67	48	60	18	9
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Conditionally recommended	167	63	45	39	10	5
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Highly recommended	200	64	47	60	17	7
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Recommended	194	63	42	60	14	9
Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Recommended	177	56	45	57	16	3
Show test details

AutoMotorSport Winter tyre test 2020 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	9,5	8,7	9,9	10	9
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Satisfactory	7,1	6,9	6,7	5	8
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Very good	9,5	8,5	9,2	10	8
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Very good	7,0	7,3	9,9	10	8
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2020 245/45 R18

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	30,3	24,3
Falken EuroWinter HS01	37	27
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	30,3	24,5
Fulda Kristall Control HP2	36,3	24,5
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2020 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	1,3	2,0	1,8	2,1	2,5	1,0	1,8
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Satisfactory	2,3	2,9	2,7	2,4	3,0	2,0	2,4
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good	1,3	2,1	2,1	2,4	2,9	2,5	2,0
Show test details