Segment
1. Falken EuroAllSeason AS220 Pro Upper-middle2. Kenda Kenetica 4S SUV Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Taiwan (Kenda). Generally, Falken allround tyres are slightly better rated (46%) than Kenda (0%). Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2023 235/65 R17 test, where both the EuroAllSeason AS220 Pro and the Kenetica 4S SUV were tested.
| # | Falken EuroAllSeason AS220 Pro
| Kenda Kenetica 4S SUV
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | |||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Falken EuroAllSeason AS220 Pro Upper-middle2. Kenda Kenetica 4S SUV Lowcost
1. Falken EuroAllSeason AS220 Pro Satisfactory
1. Falken EuroAllSeason AS220 Pro Satisfactory
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Falken EuroAllSeason AS220 Pro Rating: Satisfactory | |||||||
| Kenda Kenetica 4S SUV Rating: Not recommended | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||