Segment
1. Falken EuroAllSeason AS220 Pro Upper-middle2. Kenda Kenetica 4S SUV Lowcost
Comparison: Falken EuroAllSeason AS220 Pro vs. Kenda Kenetica 4S SUV
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Taiwan (Kenda). Generally, Falken allround tyres are slightly better rated (46%) than Kenda (0%). Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2023 235/65 R17 test, where both the EuroAllSeason AS220 Pro and the Kenetica 4S SUV were tested.
| # | Falken EuroAllSeason AS220 Pro
| Kenda Kenetica 4S SUV
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | |||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Falken EuroAllSeason AS220 Pro Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Falken EuroAllSeason AS220 Pro Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Falken EuroAllSeason AS220 Pro Rating: Satisfactory | |||||||
| Kenda Kenetica 4S SUV Rating: Not recommended | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
