Segment
1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A Premium2. Falken EuroAllSeason AS220 Pro Upper-middle
Comparison: Falken EuroAllSeason AS220 Pro vs. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook allround tyres are slightly better rated (77%) than Falken (54%). In this particular case, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A has a better rating of 88% compared to 59% of the Falken EuroAllSeason AS220 Pro. The first tyre test of Falken EuroAllSeason AS220 Pro was done in 2023, compared to 2021 when was the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2023 235/65 R17 test, where both the EuroAllSeason AS220 Pro and the Kinergy 4S2 X H750A were tested.
| # | Falken EuroAllSeason AS220 Pro
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R18 - R18 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A Exemplary2. Falken EuroAllSeason AS220 Pro Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Falken EuroAllSeason AS220 Pro Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow handling
Snow traction
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Falken EuroAllSeason AS220 Pro Rating: Satisfactory | |||||||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A Rating: Exemplary | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
