Segment
1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A Premium2. Falken EuroAllSeason AS220 Pro Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook allround tyres are slightly better rated (82%) than Falken (46%). In this particular case, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A has a better rating of 89% compared to 54% of the Falken EuroAllSeason AS220 Pro. The first tyre test of Falken EuroAllSeason AS220 Pro was done in 2023, compared to 2021 when was the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2023 235/65 R17 test, where both the EuroAllSeason AS220 Pro and the Kinergy 4S2 X H750A were tested.
| # | Falken EuroAllSeason AS220 Pro
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R18 - R18 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A Premium2. Falken EuroAllSeason AS220 Pro Upper-middle
1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A Exemplary2. Falken EuroAllSeason AS220 Pro Satisfactory
2. Falken EuroAllSeason AS220 Pro Satisfactory
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Falken EuroAllSeason AS220 Pro Rating: Satisfactory | |||||||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A Rating: Exemplary | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||