Segment
2. Falken EuroAllSeason AS220 Pro Upper-middle
Comparison: Falken EuroAllSeason AS220 Pro vs. Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
Table of contents:
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from Japan. Generally, Bridgestone allround tyres are slightly better rated (90%) than Falken (46%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 has a better rating of 90% compared to 54% of the Falken EuroAllSeason AS220 Pro. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2023 235/65 R17 test, where both the EuroAllSeason AS220 Pro and the Turanza All Season 6 were tested.
| # | Falken EuroAllSeason AS220 Pro
| Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R21 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 Exemplary2. Falken EuroAllSeason AS220 Pro Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 Recommended2. Falken EuroAllSeason AS220 Pro Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
Snow handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Comfort
Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Falken EuroAllSeason AS220 Pro Rating: Satisfactory | |||||||
| Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 Rating: Test winner | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
