Segment
1. Falken EuroALL Season AS210 Upper-middle2. Kumho Solus HA31 Upper-middle3. Firestone Multiseason Upper-middle
Comparison: Falken EuroALL Season AS210 vs. Kumho Solus HA31 vs. Firestone Multiseason
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Kumho Solus HA31 8.33
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Falken EuroALL Season AS210 Exemplary2. Kumho Solus HA31 Satisfactory3. Firestone Multiseason Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Solus HA31 Satisfactory2. Falken EuroALL Season AS210 Satisfactory3. Firestone Multiseason Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow handling
Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow cornering
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Price/value
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
Dry braking
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,5 | 46,3 | |||||
| Falken EuroALL Season AS210 | 44,2 | 50,9 | |||||
| Kumho Solus HA31 | 43,8 | 49,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
