Segment
1. Falken EuroALL Season AS210 Upper-middle2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Upper-middle
Comparison: Falken EuroALL Season AS210 vs. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
Table of contents:
| # | Falken EuroALL Season AS210
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R20 | R13 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
In this article, we will compare two all-season tyres: the Falken EuroALL Season AS210 and the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S. Both tyres are designed to provide good performance throughout the year, and they have been tested in various conditions to determine their strengths and weaknesses.
Starting with the Falken EuroALL Season AS210, this tyre has an our rating of 84%. It is made in Turkey and is designed for all-round use. According to several tests conducted by Autobild and Automotorsport, the tyre's main strengths are its good traction and short braking distances on snow, high mileage, and secure aquaplaning qualities. On the flip side, it has some weaknesses, such as slight understeering in snowy and wet conditions, high rolling resistance, and extended dry braking distances.
On the other hand, the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S has an our rating of 76% and is made in China. This tyre is also designed for all-round use. In the same tests conducted by Autobild, the Kumho tyre's main strengths include good snow braking, stable dry handling, high mileage, good value for money, and low exterior noise. However, it is not without its weaknesses, which include slightly extended wet and dry braking distances, average aquaplaning reserves, and mediocre comfort.
In a mutual test conducted by Autobild, the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S ranked 10th out of 32 total tyres, while the Falken EuroALL Season AS210 came in at 11th place. This shows that both tyres are quite close in their overall performance, with the Kumho tyre having a slight edge according to the test results.
In summary, the Falken EuroALL Season AS210 and Kumho HA32 Solus 4S both offer good all-round performance, with each tyre having its own strengths and weaknesses. Depending on your driving needs and preferences, one tyre may be better suited for you than the other. Based on the test results, the Kumho tyre may be a better option if you prioritize snow braking and low noise levels, while the Falken may be the better choice if you value high mileage and aquaplaning properties. However, due to their close test rankings, both tyres should provide a reliable and safe driving experience throughout the year.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S 10.78
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Falken EuroALL Season AS210 Exemplary2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Satisfactory2. Falken EuroALL Season AS210 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow handling
Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow cornering
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Price/value
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,9 | 44,4 | |||||
| Falken EuroALL Season AS210 | 44,4 | 51,6 | |||||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S | 44,4 | 51,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1- | 1 | |||
| Falken EuroALL Season AS210 Rating: Good | 2- | 2- | 2 | 2+ | |||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Rating: Good | 2- | 2- | 2+ | 2+ | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Wear | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 2+ | 1 | 1 | ||
| Falken EuroALL Season AS210 Rating: Satisfactory | 2+ | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2+ | ||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 37,6 | 50 | |||||
| Falken EuroALL Season AS210 | 42,2 | 50,8 | |||||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S | 41,5 | 54,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1 | ||||
| Falken EuroALL Season AS210 Rating: Good | 2 | 2- | 2+ | ||||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2- | 3+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1 | 1 | |||
| Falken EuroALL Season AS210 Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1- | |||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2 | 2+ | 3 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,7 | 45 | |||||
| Falken EuroALL Season AS210 | 42,7 | 51,3 | |||||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S | 44,3 | 49,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
