Segment
1. Falken EuroALL Season AS210 Upper-middle2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle
Comparison: Falken EuroALL Season AS210 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Kumho allround tyres are slightly better rated (55%) than Falken (46%). In this particular case, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 has a better rating of 69% compared to 48% of the Falken EuroALL Season AS210. The first tyre test of Falken EuroALL Season AS210 was done in 2018, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho Ecsta HS52 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 67% of Falken EuroALL Season AS210 has B wet grip rating, whereas 75% of Kumho Ecsta HS52 has A rating. We also know where EuroALL Season AS210 is made - Turkey.
| # | Falken EuroALL Season AS210
| Kumho Ecsta HS52
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R20 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Falken EuroALL Season AS210 Exemplary2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good2. Falken EuroALL Season AS210 Satisfactory
