Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Premium2. Falken e.Ziex Upper-middle
Comparison: Falken e.Ziex vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005
Table of contents:
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from Japan. Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Falken (70%). In this particular case, the Falken e.Ziex has a better rating of 90% compared to 88% of the Bridgestone Turanza T005. The first tyre test of Falken e.Ziex was done in 2023, compared to 2018 when was the Bridgestone Turanza T005 first tested. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the e.Ziex is made in Turkey and Turanza T005 is made in Hungary/Poland/France/Italy.
| # | Falken e.Ziex
| Bridgestone Turanza T005
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R21 | R14 - R23 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Falken e.Ziex 3.67
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Exemplary2. Falken e.Ziex Very good
Worst rating in test
2. Falken e.Ziex Good
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
2. Falken e.Ziex 68%
Wet braking
1. Falken e.Ziex 87%
Wet handling
2. Falken e.Ziex 69%
Aquaplaning - cross
2. Falken e.Ziex 61%
Wet side guide
2. Falken e.Ziex 73%
Wet circle cornering
2. Falken e.Ziex 77%
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
1. Falken e.Ziex 88%
Dry handling
2. Falken e.Ziex 81%
Dry lane changing
1. Falken e.Ziex 87%
Dry steering response
2. Falken e.Ziex 73%
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
1. Falken e.Ziex 95%
Price/value
1. Falken e.Ziex 60%
Mileage
2. Falken e.Ziex 60%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
1. Falken e.Ziex 78%
Comfort
2. Falken e.Ziex 78%
