Segment
1. Vredestein Ultrac Pro Premium2. Falken Azenis RS820 Upper-middle
Comparison: Falken Azenis RS820 vs. Vredestein Ultrac Pro
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). Generally, Falken summer tyres are slightly better rated (67%) than Vredestein (34%). In this particular case, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro has a better rating of 71% compared to 57% of the Falken Azenis RS820. The first tyre test of Falken Azenis RS820 was done in 2025, compared to 2024 when was the Vredestein Ultrac Pro first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2025 295/30 R20 test, where both the Azenis RS820 and the Ultrac Pro were tested. We also know where Azenis RS820 is made - Japan.
| # | Falken Azenis RS820
| Vredestein Ultrac Pro
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R19 - R20 | R18 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Ultrac Pro Exemplary2. Falken Azenis RS820 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Falken Azenis RS820 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Falken Azenis RS820 Rating: Satisfactory | |||||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Pro Rating: Satisfactory | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
