Segment
1. Vredestein Ultrac Pro Premium2. Falken Azenis FK520 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). Generally, Falken summer tyres are slightly better rated (68%) than Vredestein (34%). In this particular case, the Falken Azenis FK520 has a better rating of 72% compared to 71% of the Vredestein Ultrac Pro. The first tyre test of Falken Azenis FK520 was done in 2023, compared to 2024 when was the Vredestein Ultrac Pro first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2025 225/45 R18 test, where both the Azenis FK520 and the Ultrac Pro were tested. See more mutual tests below. We also know where Azenis FK520 is made - Turkey.
# | Falken Azenis FK520
| Vredestein Ultrac Pro
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R17 - R21 | R18 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Vredestein Ultrac Pro Premium2. Falken Azenis FK520 Upper-middle
1. Vredestein Ultrac Pro Exemplary2. Falken Azenis FK520 Highly recommended
2. Falken Azenis FK520 Good -
Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 279 | 141 | 139 | ||||
Falken Azenis FK520 Rating: - | 219 | 102 | 117 | ||||
Vredestein Ultrac Pro Rating: - | 230 | 115 | 115 | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,6 | 1,5 | |||||
Falken Azenis FK520 Rating: Good | 2,4 | 2,4 | |||||
Vredestein Ultrac Pro Rating: Good | 2,8 | 2,0 | |||||
Show test details |