Segment
1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Premium2. Falken Azenis FK520 Upper-middle3. Avon ZV7 Lowcost
Comparison: Falken Azenis FK520 vs. Vredestein Quatrac Pro vs. Avon ZV7
Number of sizes available
1. Avon ZV7 278
Number of tests
Best position in test
3. Avon ZV7 8.
Worst position in test
3. Avon ZV7 42.
Average position in tests
3. Avon ZV7 18.55
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Exemplary2. Falken Azenis FK520 Highly recommended3. Avon ZV7 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK520 Good -2. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Conditionally recommended3. Avon ZV7 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
3. Avon ZV7 60%
Wet braking
3. Avon ZV7 74%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
2. Avon ZV7 79%
Wet handling
2. Avon ZV7 85%
Wet circle cornering
2. Avon ZV7 74%
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
1. Avon ZV7 88%
Dry braking
2. Avon ZV7 75%
Dry lane changing
3. Avon ZV7 0%
Dry steering response
3. Avon ZV7 0%
Offroad
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
2. Avon ZV7 69%
Mileage
3. Avon ZV7 55%
Price/value
3. Avon ZV7 25%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
2. Avon ZV7 82%
Comfort
3. Avon ZV7 0%
