Segment
1. Vredestein Ultrac Pro Premium2. Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ Premium3. Falken Azenis FK520 Upper-middle4. Linglong Sport Master Lowcost5. Nexen N fera Sport Lowcost6. Avon ZV7 Lowcost
Comparison: Falken Azenis FK520 vs. Linglong Sport Master vs. Vredestein Ultrac Pro vs. Nexen N fera Sport vs. Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ vs. Avon ZV7
On paper the Falken Azenis FK520 (our rating: 74%) and the Linglong Sport Master (our rating: 72%) are both summer tyres aimed at sporty drivers, but independent test results show clear differences in character and performance.
Test positions and summary
- ACE tests: the FK520 finished 4th of 10, with its standout abilities in aquaplaning (both longitudinal and cross). The Sport Master placed 8th, its main strength listed as wet handling.
- ACE 2026 detailed notes show the FK520 delivering the test’s best cross aquaplaning result and top dry handling (1st) plus good rolling resistance, but a surprising weakness in wet handling (last place). The Sport Master impressed in the same ACE series with the best wet handling, strong wet braking (3rd) and good wet traction — however it had the weakest dry handling and below‑average rolling resistance.
- Auto Bild rounds: both tyres are mid‑pack in a large 50‑tyre comparison — FK520 at 8th, Sport Master at 7th. Auto Bild highlights the FK520’s longitudinal aquaplaning resistance and low exterior noise; the Linglong scores repeatably for low exterior noise and attractive price.
Strengths & weaknesses
Falken Azenis FK520
- Strengths: Excellent dry handling and short dry braking, top cross aquaplaning resistance, competitive rolling resistance and low noise — safe and efficient on dry roads.
- Weaknesses: In at least one ACE evaluation it showed poor wet handling and limited lateral control in heavy rain; drivers in extreme wet conditions should be cautious.
- Note: the FK520 succeeded the older Falken Azenis FK510, and is actively sold as the current UUHP summer tyre. Manufacturer: Falken.
Linglong Sport Master
- Strengths: Outstanding wet handling in the ACE 2026 round, very good wet braking and traction in the wet, low exterior noise and attractive price — a strong value proposition for wet conditions.
- Weaknesses: The Sport Master shows the weakest dry handling in some tests, understeer tendency on dry surfaces, lower mileage (wear) and subpar rolling resistance — costs and fuel-efficiency may suffer long term.
- Manufacturer: Linglong.
Verdict — which tyre is better overall?
Across the combined tests the Falken Azenis FK520 is the more well‑balanced performer: it excels on dry roads, resists aquaplaning very well and offers better rolling resistance and noise levels, resulting in a marginally higher overall rating. The Linglong Sport Master is a surprise performer in wet scenarios and represents very good value, but its weaker dry handling, durability and efficiency keep it behind the Falken in most comprehensive comparatives. If you prioritize dry handling, fuel economy and a broadly safer all‑round tyre, choose the FK520. If you mainly need the best wet grip for the budget and accept trade‑offs in wear and dry behavior, the Sport Master is a compelling option.
Learn more: Falken Azenis FK520 | Linglong Sport Master
Number of sizes available
1. Avon ZV7 278
Number of tests
Best position in test
6. Avon ZV7 8.
Worst position in test
6. Avon ZV7 42.
Average position in tests
6. Avon ZV7 18.55
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nexen N fera Sport Exemplary2. Vredestein Ultrac Pro Exemplary3. Falken Azenis FK520 Highly recommended5. Avon ZV7 Satisfactory6. Linglong Sport Master Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
3. Nexen N fera Sport Satisfactory4. Linglong Sport Master Satisfactory5. Falken Azenis FK520 Good -6. Avon ZV7 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
5. Avon ZV7 0%
Aquaplaning - cross
5. Avon ZV7 0%
Wet braking
5. Avon ZV7 0%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
5. Avon ZV7 0%
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
4. Avon ZV7 0%
Dry handling
4. Avon ZV7 0%
Offroad
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
6. Avon ZV7 0%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
5. Avon ZV7 0%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 5 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
5
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.8 | 25.2 | |||||
| Falken Azenis FK520 | 35.3 | 27.8 | |||||
| Linglong Sport Master | 33.9 | 25.2 | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Pro | 34.2 | 28.8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | Rolling resistance | Noise | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 141 | 68 | 55 | 23 | 16 | 7 | |
| Falken Azenis FK520 Rating: Highly recommended | 135 | 62 | 52 | 21 | 15 | 6 | |
| Linglong Sport Master Rating: Recommended | 129 | 68 | 44 | 17 | 11 | 6 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Falken Azenis FK520 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Linglong Sport Master Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2- | 3 | ||||
| Nexen N Fera Sport Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2- | 3+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | |||||
| Falken Azenis FK520 Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | |||||
| Linglong Sport Master Rating: Satisfactory | 3 | 2- | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 58.1 | 24.8 | |||||
| Falken Azenis FK520 | 60.7 | 27 | |||||
| Linglong Sport Master | 60.2 | 25.8 | |||||
| Nexen N Fera Sport | 63.2 | 27.2 | |||||
| Avon ZV7 | 65.1 | 28 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
