12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Falken Azenis FK510 vs. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 vs. Uniroyal RainSport 3 vs. Nokian Powerproof vs. Barum Bravuris 5 HM

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Falken Azenis FK510 /0%	Yokohama Advan Sport V105 /0%	Uniroyal RainSport 3 /0%	Nokian Powerproof /0%	Barum Bravuris 5 HM /30%

Dimensions	R17 - R22	R16 - R23	R14 - R20	R17 - R20	R14 - R21
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

When it comes to summer tyres, Falken Azenis FK510 and Yokohama Advan Sport V105 are two models that stand out. Both manufactured by Japanese companies—Falken and Yokohama respectively—they cater to a similar market, but how do they compare?

Falken Azenis FK510 comes from factories in Japan and Turkey and has been evaluated with a score of 71% by our team. This tyre's strengths include comfort, wet braking, wet handling, exterior noise, price/value, and rolling resistance. In the Autobild test with 50 tyres, it came in the respectable 15th place. Moreover, in the GTÜ test of 14 tyres, it stood at the admirable 5th position. Note that this model has been replaced and the Falken Azenis FK520 is the latest offering from Falken.

On the other hand, Yokohama Advan Sport V105 is yet to be rated by our team. Its position in tyre tests was not as consistent as the Falken Azenis FK510. It came 26th in Autobild tests and 11th in GTÜ's tests, suggesting a significant room for improvement. It's worth noting that a newer model to replace the Advan Sport V105 has not been introduced by Yokohama yet.

In summary, the Falken Azenis FK510 has a notable list of strengths and an impressive performance in mutual tests, outperforming the Yokohama Advan Sport V105 in every comparison. This tyre provides a comfortable driving experience with good wet braking and handling abilities and has a pleasing price/value ratio. This model has already been replaced by a newer model, suggesting continual improvements from the manufacturer.

The Yokohama Advan Sport V105, while yet to be rated by our team, could not sustain a consistent performance in mutual tests compared to the Falken tyre. However, if it aligns with your specific needs and preferences, it might still be a good choice. Keep an eye out for the arrival of any new model that may address the existing drawbacks and bring enhancements.

Segment

1. Falken Azenis FK510 Upper-middle

2. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Upper-middle

3. Uniroyal RainSport 3 Upper-middle

4. Nokian Powerproof Upper-middle

5. Barum Bravuris 5 HM Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Barum Bravuris 5 HM 161

2. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 136

3. Falken Azenis FK510 125

4. Uniroyal RainSport 3 110

5. Nokian Powerproof 53

Number of tests

1. Falken Azenis FK510 29x

2. Nokian Powerproof 11x

3. Barum Bravuris 5 HM 8x

4. Uniroyal RainSport 3 8x

5. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 6x

Best position in test

1. Falken Azenis FK510 1.

2. Nokian Powerproof 2.

3. Uniroyal RainSport 3 4.

4. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 4.

5. Barum Bravuris 5 HM 8.

Worst position in test

1. Falken Azenis FK510 15.

2. Uniroyal RainSport 3 21.

3. Nokian Powerproof 21.

4. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 26.

5. Barum Bravuris 5 HM 46.

Average position in tests

1. Falken Azenis FK510 5.45

2. Nokian Powerproof 7.45

3. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 10.5

4. Uniroyal RainSport 3 12

5. Barum Bravuris 5 HM 26.38

Year of the last test

1. Barum Bravuris 5 HM 2023

2. Falken Azenis FK510 2022

3. Nokian Powerproof 2022

4. Uniroyal RainSport 3 2020

5. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 2020

Best rating in test

1. Nokian Powerproof Exemplary

2. Falken Azenis FK510 Exemplary

3. Barum Bravuris 5 HM Good

4. Uniroyal RainSport 3 Satisfactory

5. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Falken Azenis FK510 Recommended

2. Uniroyal RainSport 3 Satisfactory

3. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Satisfactory

4. Nokian Powerproof Conditionally recommended

5. Barum Bravuris 5 HM Conditionally recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

Falken
Azenis FK510

85%

Nokian
Powerproof

80.2%

Yokohama
Advan Sport V105

74%

Barum
Bravuris 5 HM

59.7%

Uniroyal
RainSport 3

58.4%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Falken Azenis FK510 A

2. Nokian Powerproof A

3. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 A

4. Barum Bravuris 5 HM B

5. Uniroyal RainSport 3 ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Nokian
Powerproof

82.7%

Yokohama
Advan Sport V105

77%

Falken
Azenis FK510

71%

Barum
Bravuris 5 HM

61%

Uniroyal
RainSport 3

56.5%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Barum
Bravuris 5 HM

84%

Uniroyal
RainSport 3

84.6%

Falken
Azenis FK510

67%

Nokian
Powerproof

64.9%

Yokohama
Advan Sport V105

59%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Barum Bravuris 5 HM C

2. Nokian Powerproof C

3. Falken Azenis FK510 E

4. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 E

5. Uniroyal RainSport 3 ?

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Falken
Azenis FK510

80%

Uniroyal
RainSport 3

76%

Nokian
Powerproof

75.5%

Yokohama
Advan Sport V105

71%

Barum
Bravuris 5 HM

61%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Falken Azenis FK510 69 dB

2. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 73 dB

3. Uniroyal RainSport 3 ?

4. Nokian Powerproof ?

5. Barum Bravuris 5 HM ?

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Summer tyre test 2020 245/35 R19

Name	Wet	Dry
Best values in test	2+	1-
Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Satisfactory	1-	2-
Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2
Show test details

Autobild Summer tyre test 2020 245/45 R18

Name	Stopping distance on dry	Stopping distance on wet
Best values in test	32,1	28,7
Falken Azenis FK510	36	30,7
Yokohama Advan Sport V105	35,3	34,7
Uniroyal Rainsport 3	35,7	32,4
Nokian Powerproof	32,9	29,1
Barum Bravuris 5 HM	37,7	36,1
Show test details