Segment
1. Pirelli P ZERO Premium2. Falken Azenis FK510 Upper-middle3. Uniroyal RainSport 3 Upper-middle4. Nokian Powerproof Upper-middle
Comparison: Falken Azenis FK510 vs. Uniroyal RainSport 3 vs. Nokian Powerproof vs. Pirelli P ZERO vs. Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 K117
Let us compare two popular summer tyres, the Falken Azenis FK510 and the Uniroyal RainSport 3, to help you decide which one is the best choice for your vehicle. These tyres have been tested by various experts and their performance has been rated based on multiple factors. Here, we will summarize the data from all the tests and provide you a verdict about the strengths and weaknesses of each tyre.
Falken Azenis FK510
Falken, a Japanese tyre manufacturer, designed the Azenis FK510 as a high-performance summer tyre. It has an impressive 90% rating on our website, indicating its excellent performance in various driving conditions. This tyre is manufactured in Japan and Turkey, and although it is not currently offered as original equipment, it has gained popularity in the aftermarket.
The Azenis FK510 was featured in the Autobild test, where it ranked 3rd out of 52 tyres. Some of its best features include exterior noise, price/value, and rolling resistance. The Falken Azenis FK510 has been replaced by the Falken Azenis FK520, which offers even better performance and reliability.
Uniroyal RainSport 3
On the other hand, the RainSport 3 is a summer tyre produced by Uniroyal, well-known for its expertise in wet weather performance. With a 78% rating on our website, this tyre is a good option for those who value safety, grip, and comfort in wet conditions. The Uniroyal RainSport 3 has not been replaced by a newer tyre yet.
In the same Autobild test, the Uniroyal RainSport 3 secured the 6th position among the 52 tyres, which is a commendable result. This tyre excels in wet grip and braking, as well as hydroplaning resistance, making it a reliable option for driving in the rain.
Verdict
When comparing both tyres, the Falken Azenis FK510 seems to have an edge over the Uniroyal RainSport 3 in terms of overall test results and expert ratings. The FK510 excels in noise, price/value, and rolling resistance, while the RainSport 3 shines in wet weather performance. Ultimately, the choice between the two tyres depends on your driving needs and preferences.
If you prioritize a quiet, comfortable ride with good value for money, the Falken Azenis FK510 is an excellent choice. However, if you are looking for a tyre with outstanding wet grip and hydroplaning resistance, you may want to consider the Uniroyal RainSport 3 as an alternative. Both tyres are reputable and offer solid performance, so you cannot go wrong with either choice.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Nokian Powerproof 7.453. Pirelli P ZERO 6.06
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian Powerproof Exemplary2. Falken Azenis FK510 Exemplary3. Pirelli P ZERO Highly recommended4. Uniroyal RainSport 3 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Pirelli P ZERO Good2. Falken Azenis FK510 Recommended3. Uniroyal RainSport 3 Satisfactory4. Nokian Powerproof Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Falken Azenis FK510 69 dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 5 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
5
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2 | 1- | ||||
| Uniroyal Rainsport 3 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2- | 2+ | ||||
| Nokian Powerproof Rating: Good | 1- | 2+ | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 | 36 | 30,7 | |||||
| Uniroyal Rainsport 3 | 35,7 | 32,4 | |||||
| Nokian Powerproof | 32,9 | 29,1 | |||||
| Pirelli P ZERO | 34,8 | 34,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 28,7 | |||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 | 36 | 29 | |||||
| Uniroyal Rainsport 3 | 37,4 | 32,3 | |||||
| Pirelli P ZERO | 35,1 | 28,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Uniroyal RainSport 3 Rating: Satisfactory | 1- | 2- | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 34,6 | |||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 | 35,5 | 34,8 | |||||
| Uniroyal Rainsport 3 | 36,4 | 34,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
