Segment
1. Pirelli P ZERO Premium2. Falken Azenis FK510 Upper-middle
Comparison: Falken Azenis FK510 vs. Pirelli P ZERO
Table of contents:
| # | Falken Azenis FK510
| Pirelli P ZERO
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
In this comparison, we will be looking at two high-performance summer tyres, the Falken Azenis FK510 and the Pirelli P ZERO.
Introducing the Falken Azenis FK510, a tyre that has been rated at 90% by our experts. This tyre is manufactured in Japan and Turkey and has not been succeeded by a newer model. Designed for a comfortable and reliable ride, it offers excellent wet and dry performance at an affordable price.
On the other hand, we have the Pirelli P ZERO, a well-known tyre with an 88% rating from our experts. Made in Italy, this tyre offers excellent grip and handling in both wet and dry conditions.
Upon reviewing several tests conducted on both tyres, we can conclude as follows:
The Falken Azenis FK510 outperformed the Pirelli P ZERO in several tests, including: ACE (1st place out of 11 tyres) and Sportscars (4th place out of 9 tyres). Additionally, the Falken tyre features an impressive exterior noise level, wet braking, and wet handling, making it an ideal choice for drivers who value comfort and safety.
However, the Pirelli P ZERO secured better positions in the following tests: AutoMotorSport (4th place out of 11 tyres), Autobild (4th place out of 53 tyres), and GTÜ (4th place out of 14 tyres). This tyre received praise for its dry handling, wet circle cornering, and dry braking performance.
In summary, the Falken Azenis FK510 offers a comfortable and quiet ride, with very good wet performance, while the Pirelli P ZERO offers excellent dry and wet grip and handling. The Falken tyre is a good choice for drivers who prioritize comfort and wet performance, whereas the Pirelli tyre is a better fit for those who require top-notch dry and wet performance.
Both tyre manufacturers, Falken and Pirelli, are known to produce high-quality summer tyres. While the Falken Azenis FK510 edged out the Pirelli P ZERO in some tests, each tyre has its own strengths and weaknesses. It is essential to consider your driving needs and preferences when making your decision.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Pirelli P ZERO 6.06
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Exemplary2. Pirelli P ZERO Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Pirelli P ZERO Good2. Falken Azenis FK510 Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Dry lane changing
Dry steering response
Dry driving behavior
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Falken Azenis FK510 69 dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | Comfort | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,4 | 9,3 | 10 | 10 | 10 | ||
| Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Good | 6,7 | 7,6 | 7 | 7 | 7 | ||
| Pirelli P ZERO Rating: Very good | 8,2 | 8,5 | 6 | 8 | 9 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 | 36 | 30,7 | |||||
| Pirelli P ZERO | 34,8 | 34,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,7 | 1,3 | 2,8 | 2,0 | 1,6 | ||
| Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,4 | 2,9 | 3,0 | 2,0 | 2,0 | ||
| Pirelli P ZERO Rating: Satisfactory | 1,8 | 1,3 | 2,9 | 3,0 | 2,7 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Good | |||||||
| Pirelli P ZERO Rating: Good + | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Pirelli P ZERO Rating: Good | 1- | 2+ | 3+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 28,7 | |||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 | 36 | 29 | |||||
| Pirelli P ZERO | 35,1 | 28,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,4 | 9,8 | 9,3 | 10 | |||
| Falken Azenis FK510 | 8,5 | 9,2 | 7,5 | 8,6 | |||
| Pirelli P ZERO | 8,3 | 8,5 | 8,6 | 5,9 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 150 | 55 | 39 | 14 | 7 | ||
| Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Recommended | 150 | 66 | 46 | 16 | 9 | ||
| Pirelli P ZERO Rating: Recommended | 141 | 58 | 50 | 16 | 8 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,4 | ||||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Recommended | 8,0 | ||||||
| Pirelli P ZERO Rating: Recommended | 8,8 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | |||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Recommended | 2+ | 2 | |||||
| Pirelli P ZERO Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2+ | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 278 | 146 | 143 | 25 | 10 | ||
| Falken Azenis FK510 | 244 | 114 | 130 | 16 | 10 | ||
| Pirelli P ZERO | 263 | 133 | 130 | 13 | 9 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
