Segment
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Upper-middle2. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) Upper-middle
Comparison: Falken Azenis FK510 vs. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Falken summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Kumho (58%). The first tyre test of Falken Azenis FK510 was done in 2016, compared to 2025 when was the Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 69% of Falken Azenis FK510 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) also have A wet ratings. We also know where Azenis FK510 is made - Japan/Turkey.
| # | Falken Azenis FK510
| Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R17 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Exemplary2. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) Very good
Worst rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Recommended2. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Wet side guide
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Dry lane changing
Dry steering response
Dry driving behavior
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Falken Azenis FK510 69 dB
