Segment
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Premium2. Bridgestone Turanza T001 Premium3. Falken Azenis FK510 Upper-middle4. Fulda SportControl 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Falken Azenis FK510 vs. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 vs. Fulda SportControl 2 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T001
In the world of summer tyres, the Falken Azenis FK510 and the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 are two noteworthy contenders. Our reviews, backed by comprehensive test results, reveal unique strengths and weaknesses for every tyre.
Firstly, the Falken Azenis FK510, coming from the Japanese and Turkish manufacturing plants of Falken, earned a commendable rating of 58%. In the Autozeitung test, it took a solid third position out of 6 total tyres tested, standing out particularly for its wet circle cornering capabilities. In the Autobild test, it secured the same position, but out of a more extensive field of 52 tyres, marking it as immensely competitive. It's worth mentioning that the FK510 model is now succeeded by the Falken Azenis FK520.
On the other hand, the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 was produced in Hungary and even used as first equipment on certain Citroën C3 Aircross models. The Prime3 K125 secured a rating of 52%, showcasing particular strength in exterior noise reduction according to the Autozeitung test. This model came in fifth in the same test and rose to the second position in the Autobild test amongst 52 tyres. It's pertinent to highlight that this model has since been replaced by the Hankook Ventus Prime 4.
In summary, both tyres exhibit strengths in different areas; the Falken Azenis FK510 shines when it comes to wet circle cornering, making it a safe choice during rainy conditions. Meanwhile, the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 prevails in noise reduction, promising a more comfortable drive.
According to the mutual test positions, the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 slightly edges out the Falken Azenis FK510 overall, given its higher rank in the Autobild test. However, bearing in mind that both have now been replaced by newer models, you may also want to consider the Falken Azenis FK520 and the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 for your next tyre purchase.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
4. Fulda SportControl 2 11.69
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Exemplary2. Fulda SportControl 2 Exemplary3. Falken Azenis FK510 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Recommended2. Fulda SportControl 2 Satisfactory3. Bridgestone Turanza T001 Satisfactory4. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Falken Azenis FK510 69 dB
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
3
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 280 | 149 | 131 | ||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 | 256 | 133 | 123 | ||||
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 | 222 | 93 | 129 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T001 Rating: Good | 1- | 2 | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 34,6 | |||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 | 35,5 | 34,8 | |||||
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 | 34,3 | 35,7 | |||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 | 35,1 | 37,9 | |||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T001 | 36,2 | 34,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
