Segment
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Upper-middle2. Debica Presto UHP 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Falken Azenis FK510 vs. Debica Presto UHP 2
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica). Generally, Falken summer tyres are slightly better rated (68%) than Debica (58%). In this particular case, the Falken Azenis FK510 has a better rating of 58% compared to 56% of the Debica Presto UHP 2. The first tyre test of Falken Azenis FK510 was done in 2016, compared to 2024 when was the Debica Presto UHP 2 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 69% of Falken Azenis FK510 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (70%) of the Debica Presto UHP 2 also have A wet ratings. We also know where Azenis FK510 is made - Japan/Turkey.
| # | Falken Azenis FK510
| Debica Presto UHP 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R17 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Exemplary2. Debica Presto UHP 2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Recommended2. Debica Presto UHP 2 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Wet side guide
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Dry lane changing
Dry steering response
Dry driving behavior
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Falken Azenis FK510 69 dB
