Segment
2. Falken Azenis FK510 Upper-middle3. Cooper Zeon CS8 Upper-middle
Comparison: Falken Azenis FK510 vs. Cooper Zeon CS8 vs. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
3. Cooper Zeon CS8 19.71
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Exemplary2. Falken Azenis FK510 Exemplary3. Cooper Zeon CS8 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Falken Azenis FK510 Recommended3. Cooper Zeon CS8 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Falken Azenis FK510 69 dB2. Cooper Zeon CS8 70 dB
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 4 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
4
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 28,7 | |||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 | 36 | 29 | |||||
| Cooper Zeon CS8 | 37,3 | 34,3 | |||||
| GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | 34,7 | 28,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,4 | 9,8 | 9,3 | 10 | |||
| Falken Azenis FK510 | 8,5 | 9,2 | 7,5 | 8,6 | |||
| Cooper Zeon CS8 | 7,1 | 7,1 | 7,2 | 6,9 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Cooper Zeon CS8 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2- | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 34,6 | |||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 | 35,5 | 34,8 | |||||
| Cooper Zeon CS8 | 37 | 39,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
