These tyres were tested together in 12 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
| Organization | Season | Year | Dimension | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Autobild
|
Summer
|
2022 | 225/45 R18 | View |
AutoMotorSport
|
Summer
|
2022 | 245/45 R19 | View |
GTÜ
|
Summer
|
2021 | 225/45 R17 | View |
Autozeitung
|
Summer
|
2021 | 225/40 R18 | View |
ADAC
|
Summer
|
2021 | 225/50 R17 | View |
AutoMotorSport
|
Summer
|
2020 | 225/45 R18 | View |
Autobild
|
Summer
|
2020 | 245/45 R18 | View |
ADAC
|
Summer
|
2020 | 225/40 R18 | View |
Autobild
|
Summer
|
2019 | 225/45 R17 | View |
Automotorsport
|
Summer
|
2018 | 225/45 R17 | View |
ACE
|
Summer
|
2018 | 235/45 R18 | View |
Autozeitung
|
Summer
|
2018 | 225/45 R17 | View |
The Falken Azenis FK510 and Continental PremiumContact 6 are both premium summer tyres that offer good performance with a few differences that set them apart.
The Falken Azenis FK510, made in Japan and Turkey, is widely lauded for its comfort, exterior noise levels and price-to-value ratio. According to tests at AutoBild where it ranked 3rd out of 52 tyres, notable features include its rolling resistance and grip in wet and dry conditions. However, it exhibits deficits in aquaplaning and brake balance in dry conditions, making it more suitable for less dynamically demanding vehicles.
On the other hand, the Continental PremiumContact 6, manufactured in Slovakia, Germany and the Czech Republic, shines in dry conditions with short braking distances and stable handling. Ranking 1st in the AutoBild test, it also boasts of a good price-to-value ratio and fuel-efficient rolling resistance. Notable shortcomings include slowed steering response and extended braking distance on wet surfaces.
In mutual test positions, the Falken Azenis FK510 outmatched the Continental PremiumContact 6 in the GTÜ and Autozeitung tests, but fell short in tests conducted by the AutoMotorSport and ADAC. Both tyres performed equally in a test by EVO magazine.
The Falken Azenis FK510 has recently been replaced with the newer Falken Azenis FK520, whereas Continental PremiumContact 6 has been succeeded by the Continental PremiumContact 7.
Overall, if prioritizing comfort and value, the Falken Azenis FK510 seems to be a reliable choice. However, for those desiring a tyre optimised for dry conditions and efficiency, Continental PremiumContact 6 would be more suitable.
For more details about the manufacturers, visit the website of Falken and Continental.
Averaged from 12 tests
Falken Azenis FK510
Continental PremiumContact 6
Falken Azenis FK510
Continental PremiumContact 6
Falken Azenis FK510
Continental PremiumContact 6
Falken Azenis FK510
Continental PremiumContact 6
Falken Azenis FK510
Continental PremiumContact 6
Falken Azenis FK510
Continental PremiumContact 6
Falken Azenis FK510
Continental PremiumContact 6
Falken Azenis FK510
Continental PremiumContact 6
Falken Azenis FK510
Continental PremiumContact 6
Falken Azenis FK510
Continental PremiumContact 6
Falken Azenis FK510
Continental PremiumContact 6
Falken Azenis FK510
Continental PremiumContact 6
Falken Azenis FK510
Continental PremiumContact 6
Falken Azenis FK510
Continental PremiumContact 6
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.