Segment
1. Pirelli P ZERO Premium2. Falken Azenis FK510 Upper-middle3. Barum Bravuris 5 HM Lowcost
Comparison: Falken Azenis FK510 vs. Barum Bravuris 5 HM vs. Pirelli P ZERO
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Pirelli P ZERO 6.063. Barum Bravuris 5 HM 26.38
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Exemplary2. Pirelli P ZERO Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Pirelli P ZERO Good2. Falken Azenis FK510 Recommended3. Barum Bravuris 5 HM Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Falken Azenis FK510 69 dB
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,5 | 2,6 | 1,5 | |||
| Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Good | 2,0 | 1,9 | 2,8 | 2,0 | |||
| Barum Bravuris 5 HM Rating: Satisfactory | 3,3 | 2,5 | 2,9 | 2,5 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 | 36 | 30,7 | |||||
| Barum Bravuris 5 HM | 37,7 | 36,1 | |||||
| Pirelli P ZERO | 34,8 | 34,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
