Segment
1. Falken Azenis FK510 SUV Upper-middle2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Falken summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Sava (61%). The first tyre test of Falken Azenis FK510 SUV was done in 2020, compared to 2017 when was the Sava Intensa UHP 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Promobil 2022 235/55 R17 test, where both the Azenis FK510 SUV and the Intensa UHP 2 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 57% of Falken Azenis FK510 SUV dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (71%) of the Sava Intensa UHP 2 also have A wet ratings. We also know where Azenis FK510 SUV is made - Japan.
| # | Falken Azenis FK510 SUV
| Sava Intensa UHP 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R17 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Falken Azenis FK510 SUV Upper-middle2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Lowcost
2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 13.33
1. Falken Azenis FK510 SUV Very good -2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Satisfactory
1. Falken Azenis FK510 SUV Recommended2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Still recommended
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 7,3 | 7,7 | 5,9 | ||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 SUV Rating: Recommended | 8,6 | 8,8 | 7,6 | ||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 Rating: Still recommended | 7,3 | 8,0 | 8,4 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||