Segment
1. Falken Azenis FK510 SUV Upper-middle2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle
Comparison: Falken Azenis FK510 SUV vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Falken summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Kumho (58%). The first tyre test of Falken Azenis FK510 SUV was done in 2020, compared to 2018 when was the Kumho Ecsta PS71 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 57% of Falken Azenis FK510 SUV dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (76%) of the Kumho Ecsta PS71 also have A wet ratings. We also know where Azenis FK510 SUV is made - Japan.
| # | Falken Azenis FK510 SUV
| Kumho Ecsta PS71
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R16 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Highly recommended2. Falken Azenis FK510 SUV Very good -
Worst rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 SUV Recommended2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Conditionally recommended
