Segment
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium2. Falken Azenis FK510 SUV Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (92%) than Falken (70%). The first tyre test of Falken Azenis FK510 SUV was done in 2020, compared to 2017 when was the Continental PremiumContact 6 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Promobil 2022 235/55 R17 test, where both the Azenis FK510 SUV and the PremiumContact 6 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 57% of Falken Azenis FK510 SUV dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (82%) of the Continental PremiumContact 6 also have A wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Azenis FK510 SUV is made in Japan and PremiumContact 6 is made in Slovakia/Germany/Czech Republic.
| # | Falken Azenis FK510 SUV
| Continental PremiumContact 6
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R15 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium2. Falken Azenis FK510 SUV Upper-middle
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Exemplary2. Falken Azenis FK510 SUV Very good -
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Recommended2. Falken Azenis FK510 SUV Recommended
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 7,3 | 7,7 | 5,9 | ||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 SUV Rating: Recommended | 8,6 | 8,8 | 7,6 | ||||
| Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Recommended | 8,9 | 8,3 | 8,6 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||