Segment
1. Falken Azenis FK453 Upper-middle2. Cooper Zeon CS Sport Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Cooper). Generally, Falken summer tyres are slightly better rated (68%) than Cooper (31%). But when it comes to comparing Falken Azenis FK453 and Cooper Zeon CS Sport, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Falken Azenis FK453 was done in 2015, compared to 2016 when was the Cooper Zeon CS Sport first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Automotorsport 2016 235/40 R18 test, where both the Azenis FK453 and the Zeon CS Sport were tested.
# | Falken Azenis FK453
| Cooper Zeon CS Sport
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R17 - R22 | ||
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Falken Azenis FK453 Upper-middle2. Cooper Zeon CS Sport Upper-middle
2. Cooper Zeon CS Sport 17.33
1. Cooper Zeon CS Sport Satisfactory2. Falken Azenis FK453 Conditionally recommended
1. Cooper Zeon CS Sport Conditionally recommended2. Falken Azenis FK453 Conditionally recommended
Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 9,4 | 9,6 | 9,5 | 10 | 10 | ||
Falken Azenis FK453 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 7,8 | 7,5 | 8,2 | 6 | 10 | ||
Cooper Zeon CS Sport Rating: Conditionally recommended | 7,5 | 7,1 | 7,9 | 7 | 8 | ||
Show test details |