Segment
2. Falken Azenis FK453 Upper-middle
Comparison: Falken Azenis FK453 vs. Continental SportContact 5 SUV
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (92%) than Falken (70%). But when it comes to comparing Falken Azenis FK453 and Continental SportContact 5 SUV, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Falken Azenis FK453 was done in 2015, compared to 2016 when was the Continental SportContact 5 SUV first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2016 235/55 R19 test, where both the Azenis FK453 and the SportContact 5 SUV were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Falken Azenis FK453 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (69%) of the Continental SportContact 5 SUV also have A wet ratings.
| # | Falken Azenis FK453
| Continental SportContact 5 SUV
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R18 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental SportContact 5 SUV Exemplary2. Falken Azenis FK453 Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK453 Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Offroad | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2 | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Falken Azenis FK453 Rating: - | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Continental SportContact 5 SUV Rating: - | 2 | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
