Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza T001 Premium2. Falken Azenis FK453 Upper-middle
Comparison: Falken Azenis FK453 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T001
Table of contents:
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from Japan. Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Falken (70%). But when it comes to comparing Falken Azenis FK453 and Bridgestone Turanza T001, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autoexpress 2015 225/45 R17 test, where both the Azenis FK453 and the Turanza T001 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Falken Azenis FK453 has A wet grip rating, whereas 72% of Bridgestone Turanza T001 has B rating.
| # | Falken Azenis FK453
| Bridgestone Turanza T001
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R15 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Falken Azenis FK453 Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Bridgestone Turanza T001 Satisfactory2. Falken Azenis FK453 Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 100 | 266,5 | 187,9 | 63,2 | 96,1 | ||
| Falken Azenis FK453 | 95 | 273,6 | 197,8 | 66,2 | 97,9 | ||
| Bridgestone Turanza T001 | 94,3 | 266,5 | 189,2 | 81 | 98 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
