Segment
1. Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906 Upper-middle2. Esa Tecar Supergrip Pro Lowcost
Comparison: Esa Tecar Supergrip Pro vs. Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Esa) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Generally, Yokohama winter tyres are slightly better rated (59%) than Esa (49%). In this particular case, the Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906 has a better rating of 60% compared to 49% of the Esa Tecar Supergrip Pro. The first tyre test of Esa Tecar Supergrip Pro was done in 2022, compared to 2021 when was the Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2022 215/60 R16 test, where both the Tecar Supergrip Pro and the BluEarth-Winter V906 were tested.
| # | Esa Tecar Supergrip Pro
| Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R20 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906 Satisfactory2. Esa Tecar Supergrip Pro Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906 Satisfactory2. Esa Tecar Supergrip Pro Satisfactory
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow handling
Snow traction
Snow braking
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Rolling resistance | Noise | Wear |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,8 | 1,4 | 1,8 | 1,5 | 2,7 | 1,5 |
| Esa Tecar Supergrip Pro Rating: Satisfactory | 3,0 | 3,1 | 1,9 | 2,0 | 2,8 | 3,0 | 2,0 |
| Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,6 | 2,3 | 2,6 | 2,4 | 1,9 | 2,9 | 2,5 |
| Show test details | |||||||
