Segment
1. Michelin ALPIN 6 Premium2. Duraturn Mozzo Winter Lowcost3. Sava Eskimo HP2 Lowcost
Comparison: Duraturn Mozzo Winter vs. Sava Eskimo HP2 vs. Michelin ALPIN 6
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Michelin ALPIN 6 4.352. Sava Eskimo HP2 15.47
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin ALPIN 6 Exemplary2. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Michelin ALPIN 6 Good2. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 4 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
4
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
| Duraturn Mozzo Winter | 44.7 | - | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 39.5 | 29.6 | |||||
| Michelin Alpin 6 | 36.2 | 29.7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 30,3 | ||||||
| Duraturn Mozzo Winter | 40,7 | ||||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 36,3 | 25,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
| Duraturn Mozzo Winter | 37,6 | - | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 33,6 | 24,1 | |||||
| Michelin Alpin 6 | 30,4 | 24,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,2 | 25,9 | |||||
| Duraturn Mozzo Winter | 41,5 | - | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 36,4 | 27,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
