Segment
1. Duraturn Mozzo Winter Lowcost2. Sava Eskimo HP2 Lowcost3. Barum Polaris 5 Lowcost
Comparison: Duraturn Mozzo Winter vs. Sava Eskimo HP2 vs. Barum Polaris 5
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Barum Polaris 5 15.152. Sava Eskimo HP2 15.47
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Barum Polaris 5 Good2. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory2. Barum Polaris 5 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 4 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
4
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
| Duraturn Mozzo Winter | 44.7 | - | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 39.5 | 29.6 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 37.7 | 30.0 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 30,3 | ||||||
| Duraturn Mozzo Winter | 40,7 | ||||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 36,3 | 25,1 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 35,2 | 24,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
| Duraturn Mozzo Winter | 37,6 | - | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 33,6 | 24,1 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 33,9 | 25 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,2 | 25,9 | |||||
| Duraturn Mozzo Winter | 41,5 | - | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 36,4 | 27,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
