Segment
2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium3. Duraturn Mozzo Winter Lowcost4. Barum Polaris 5 Lowcost
Comparison: Duraturn Mozzo Winter vs. Barum Polaris 5 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
3. Barum Polaris 5 15.15
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Very good2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good3. Barum Polaris 5 Good
Worst rating in test
1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Recommended2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended3. Barum Polaris 5 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
3
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
| Duraturn Mozzo Winter | 44.7 | - | |||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 37.7 | 30.0 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 30,3 | ||||||
| Duraturn Mozzo Winter | 40,7 | ||||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 35,2 | 24,9 | |||||
| GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ | 34,4 | 24,8 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 30,3 | 24,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
| Duraturn Mozzo Winter | 37,6 | - | |||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 33,9 | 25 | |||||
| GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ | 30,6 | 24,3 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 29,2 | 24,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
