Segment
2. Duraturn Mozzo Winter Lowcost3. Barum Polaris 5 Lowcost
Comparison: Duraturn Mozzo Winter vs. Barum Polaris 5 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Barum Polaris 5 15.15
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Very good2. Barum Polaris 5 Good
Worst rating in test
1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Recommended2. Barum Polaris 5 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
3
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
| Duraturn Mozzo Winter | 44.7 | - | |||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 37.7 | 30.0 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 30,3 | ||||||
| Duraturn Mozzo Winter | 40,7 | ||||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 35,2 | 24,9 | |||||
| GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ | 34,4 | 24,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
| Duraturn Mozzo Winter | 37,6 | - | |||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 33,9 | 25 | |||||
| GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ | 30,6 | 24,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
