12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Dunlop Winter Sport 5 vs. Sava Eskimo HP2 vs. Barum Polaris 5 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Dunlop Winter Sport 5 /86%	Sava Eskimo HP2 /58%	Barum Polaris 5 /63%	GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ /90%	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 /82%

Dimensions	R14 - R21	R15 - R18	R13 - R19	R15 - R22	R14 - R22
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Premium

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Premium

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 Lowcost

5. Barum Polaris 5 Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 213

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 189

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 176

4. Barum Polaris 5 76

5. Sava Eskimo HP2 25

Number of tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 49x

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 48x

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 23x

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 15x

5. Barum Polaris 5 13x

Best position in test

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 1.

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 1.

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 1.

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 6.

5. Barum Polaris 5 9.

Worst position in test

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 8.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 15.

3. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 16.

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 23.

5. Barum Polaris 5 26.

Average position in tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 3.2

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 3.26

3. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 4.9

4. Barum Polaris 5 15.15

5. Sava Eskimo HP2 15.47

Year of the last test

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 2025

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 2025

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 2024

4. Barum Polaris 5 2023

5. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 2023

Best rating in test

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Exemplary

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Very good

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good

4. Barum Polaris 5 Good

5. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Recommended

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Recommended

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended

5. Barum Polaris 5 Sufficient

Snow

(Overall rating)

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

87%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

81%

Sava
Eskimo HP2

78%

Barum
Polaris 5

75%

Snow traction

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 97%

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 91%

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 85%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 82%

5. Barum Polaris 5 71%

Snow braking

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 97%

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 92%

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 88%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

5. Barum Polaris 5 81%

Snow handling

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 87%

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 85%

3. Barum Polaris 5 81%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 72%

5. Sava Eskimo HP2 68%

Snow cornering

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 81%

3. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 78%

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 74%

5. Barum Polaris 5 67%

Dry

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

87%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+

86%

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

75%

Sava
Eskimo HP2

65%

Barum
Polaris 5

63%

Dry braking

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 87%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 81%

3. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 73%

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 66%

5. Barum Polaris 5 55%

Dry handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 92%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 84%

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 72%

4. Barum Polaris 5 71%

5. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 66%

Wet

(Overall rating)

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+

94%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

91%

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

78%

Sava
Eskimo HP2

64%

Barum
Polaris 5

61%

Wet braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 93%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 92%

3. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 79%

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 63%

5. Barum Polaris 5 55%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 97%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 88%

3. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 80%

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 73%

5. Barum Polaris 5 56%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 89%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 89%

3. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 75%

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 63%

5. Barum Polaris 5 46%

Wet handling

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 95%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 93%

3. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 77%

4. Barum Polaris 5 73%

5. Sava Eskimo HP2 60%

Wet circle cornering

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 95%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 91%

3. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 79%

4. Barum Polaris 5 73%

5. Sava Eskimo HP2 59%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 A

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ B

3. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 B

4. Barum Polaris 5 C

5. Sava Eskimo HP2 C

Comfort

(Overall rating)

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+

92%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

75%

Sava
Eskimo HP2

75%

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

73%

Barum
Polaris 5

65%

Exterior noise

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 89%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 79%

3. Barum Polaris 5 69%

4. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 67%

5. Sava Eskimo HP2 64%

Comfort

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 95%

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 83%

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 83%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 75%

5. Barum Polaris 5 61%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 72 dB

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 72 dB

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 ?

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ?

5. Barum Polaris 5 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Barum
Polaris 5

87%

Sava
Eskimo HP2

85%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

77%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

74%

Mileage

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 84%

2. Barum Polaris 5 79%

3. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 78%

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 75%

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 63%

Rolling resistance

1. Barum Polaris 5 91%

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 83%

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 83%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

5. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 81%

Price/value

1. Barum Polaris 5 92%

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 92%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 68%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 64%

5. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 57%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Sava Eskimo HP2 C

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ C

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 C

4. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 C

5. Barum Polaris 5 E

Ice

(Overall rating)

Sava
Eskimo HP2

84%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+

84.3%

Barum
Polaris 5

82%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

80%

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

80%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 14 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

AUTOBILD Winter tyre test 2024 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34.6	28.9
Dunlop Winter Sport 5	37.4	29.2
Sava Eskimo HP2	39.5	29.6
Barum Polaris 5	37.7	30.0
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2023 225/45 R17

Name	Enviromental impact	Driving safety
Best values in test	1,8	2,0
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Rating: Good	1,8	2,6
Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	2,2	3,4
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Good	2,1	2,3
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Satisfactory	3,1	3,2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,8	25,4
Dunlop Winter Sport 5	35,3	26,5
Sava Eskimo HP2	37,6	26,1
Barum Polaris 5	37,5	26,9
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+	35,5	25,5
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	32,8	26,3
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2022 215/60 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Rolling resistance	Noise	Wear
Best values in test	2,0	1,8	1,4	1,8	1,5	2,7	1,5
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Rating: Good	2,2	2,4	1,6	2,0	1,7	3,1	2,0
Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	3,0	2,5	2,3	2,0	1,7	3,5	1,5
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Good	2,5	2,5	1,4	2,2	2,0	2,8	2,5
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Satisfactory	2,0	1,8	2,7	2,4	2,1	3,4	2,5
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Wear
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+	1
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Rating: Good	2+	2-	2+	2	3+
Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	3	2-	2	2	2+
Barum Polaris 5 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	3+	2+	1-	2+
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good	1-	2	1	2	2+
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2021 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear
Best values in test	1,6	1,9	1,5	2,1	2,7	1,5
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Rating: Good	2,5	2,4	1,5	2,5	3,4	2,5
Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	3,1	3,0	2,2	2,4	4,0	2,5
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Good	2,5	2,5	2,2	2,5	3,0	2,5
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Satisfactory	1,6	1,9	2,8	2,4	3,3	3,0
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,1	27,3
Dunlop Winter Sport 5	33,6	27,3
Sava Eskimo HP2	36,5	28
Barum Polaris 5	36,1	28,8
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	32,1	28,1
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2020 245/45 R18

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	30,3	24,3
Dunlop Winter Sport 5	35,2	25
Sava Eskimo HP2	36,3	25,1
Barum Polaris 5	35,2	24,9
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+	34,4	24,8
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	30,3	24,5
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2020 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	1,3	2,0	1,8	2,1	2,5	1,0	1,8
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Rating: Good	2,3	2,5	2,0	2,3	3,0	1,5	1,8
Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	3,1	3,1	2,5	2,3	3,0	2,0	1,9
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good	1,3	2,1	2,1	2,4	2,9	2,5	2,0
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Rating: Satisfactory	2	3+	1-	2-
Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	3	1-	2
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Exemplary	1-	2	1-	2
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Exemplary	1-	2	2	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	29,2	24
Dunlop Winter Sport 5	32,9	24,3
Sava Eskimo HP2	33,6	24,1
Barum Polaris 5	33,9	25
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+	30,6	24,3
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	29,2	24,6
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Rating: Exemplary	2+	2	2	2-
Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	2-	2	1-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,2	25,9
Dunlop Winter Sport 5	33,6	27,6
Sava Eskimo HP2	36,4	27,2
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2017 215/65 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	2,1	2,0	1,9	2,3	3,1	0,5	1,4
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Rating: Good	2,1	2,3	2,5	2,5	3,5	2,0	1,7
Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	2,7	2,4	2,5	2,3	3,6	1,5	1,7
Show test details

Comparison: Dunlop Winter Sport 5 vs. Sava Eskimo HP2 vs. Barum Polaris 5 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands