12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Dunlop Winter Sport 5 vs. Michelin ALPIN 6 vs. Barum Polaris 5 vs. Sava Eskimo HP2 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Dunlop Winter Sport 5 /86%	Michelin ALPIN 6 /63%	Barum Polaris 5 /63%	Sava Eskimo HP2 /58%	Matador MP92 Sibir Snow /0%

Dimensions	R14 - R21	R15 - R20	R13 - R19	R15 - R18	R15 - R18
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Premium

2. Michelin ALPIN 6 Premium

3. Barum Polaris 5 Lowcost

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 Lowcost

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 189

2. Michelin ALPIN 6 76

3. Barum Polaris 5 76

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 43

5. Sava Eskimo HP2 25

Number of tests

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 48x

2. Michelin ALPIN 6 31x

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 15x

4. Barum Polaris 5 13x

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 8x

Best position in test

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 1.

2. Michelin ALPIN 6 1.

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 6.

4. Barum Polaris 5 9.

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 12.

Worst position in test

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 13.

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 16.

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 23.

4. Barum Polaris 5 26.

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 33.

Average position in tests

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 4.35

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 4.9

3. Barum Polaris 5 15.15

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 15.47

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 22.25

Year of the last test

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 2025

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 2025

3. Michelin ALPIN 6 2024

4. Barum Polaris 5 2023

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 2019

Best rating in test

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 Exemplary

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Exemplary

3. Barum Polaris 5 Good

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 Good

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Recommended

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory

5. Barum Polaris 5 Sufficient

Snow

(Overall rating)

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

85%

Michelin
ALPIN 6

81%

Sava
Eskimo HP2

78%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

78.3%

Barum
Polaris 5

76%

Snow traction

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 89%

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 85%

3. Michelin ALPIN 6 86%

4. Barum Polaris 5 80%

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 0%

Snow braking

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 87%

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 88%

3. Michelin ALPIN 6 79%

4. Barum Polaris 5 76%

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 0%

Snow handling

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 86%

2. Barum Polaris 5 80%

3. Michelin ALPIN 6 78%

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 68%

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 0%

Snow cornering

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 82%

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 74%

3. Barum Polaris 5 70%

4. Michelin ALPIN 6 69%

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 0%

Dry

(Overall rating)

Michelin
ALPIN 6

82%

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

77%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

75.4%

Barum
Polaris 5

70%

Sava
Eskimo HP2

65%

Dry braking

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 80%

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 71%

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 66%

4. Barum Polaris 5 62%

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 0%

Dry handling

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 80%

2. Barum Polaris 5 78%

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 72%

4. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 69%

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 0%

Wet

(Overall rating)

Michelin
ALPIN 6

78%

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

77%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

72.1%

Sava
Eskimo HP2

64%

Barum
Polaris 5

60%

Wet braking

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 79%

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 72%

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 63%

4. Barum Polaris 5 58%

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 0%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 82%

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 73%

3. Michelin ALPIN 6 73%

4. Barum Polaris 5 61%

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 0%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 77%

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 71%

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 63%

4. Barum Polaris 5 48%

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 0%

Wet handling

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 84%

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 79%

3. Barum Polaris 5 67%

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 60%

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 0%

Wet circle cornering

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 79%

2. Michelin ALPIN 6 78%

3. Barum Polaris 5 66%

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 59%

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 0%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 B

2. Michelin ALPIN 6 B

3. Barum Polaris 5 C

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 C

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow C

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Michelin
ALPIN 6

79%

Sava
Eskimo HP2

75%

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

71%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

68.2%

Barum
Polaris 5

66%

Exterior noise

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 75%

2. Barum Polaris 5 68%

3. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 65%

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 64%

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 0%

Comfort

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 84%

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 83%

3. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 78%

4. Barum Polaris 5 61%

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 0%

Interior noise

1. Sava Eskimo HP2 83%

2. Michelin ALPIN 6 82%

3. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 79%

4. Barum Polaris 5 0%

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 0%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 72 dB

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 ?

3. Michelin ALPIN 6 ?

4. Barum Polaris 5 ?

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Sava
Eskimo HP2

85%

Barum
Polaris 5

82%

Michelin
ALPIN 6

79%

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

78%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

78.1%

Mileage

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 94%

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 78%

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 75%

4. Barum Polaris 5 69%

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 0%

Rolling resistance

1. Barum Polaris 5 94%

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 83%

3. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 81%

4. Michelin ALPIN 6 75%

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 0%

Price/value

1. Sava Eskimo HP2 92%

2. Barum Polaris 5 85%

3. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 63%

4. Michelin ALPIN 6 64%

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 0%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Sava Eskimo HP2 C

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 C

3. Michelin ALPIN 6 C

4. Barum Polaris 5 E

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow F

Ice

(Overall rating)

Michelin
ALPIN 6

86%

Sava
Eskimo HP2

84%

Barum
Polaris 5

82%

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

80%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

79.3%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 17 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

AUTOBILD Winter tyre test 2024 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Rating: Good	2-	2-	1	2
Michelin Alpin 6 Rating: Exemplary	2	2	2	2
Barum Polaris 5 Rating: Satisfactory	3	3+	3	2
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2024 205/55 R16

Name	Winter	Wet	Dry	Enviromental impact	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	1.6	1.9	2.0	2.3	2.9	1.7	2.0
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Rating: Satisfactory	2.7	2.3	2.8	2.5	3.1	2.2	2.3
Michelin Alpin 6 Rating: Good	2.7	2.5	2.2	2.6	3.4	2.2	2.1
Show test details

AUTOBILD Winter tyre test 2024 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34.6	28.9
Dunlop Winter Sport 5	37.4	29.2
Michelin Alpin 6	36.2	29.7
Barum Polaris 5	37.7	30.0
Sava Eskimo HP2	39.5	29.6
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2023 205/60 R16

Name	Enviromental impact	Driving safety
Best values in test	2	2.1
DUNLOP Winter Sport 5 Rating: Good	2.3	2.1
Michelin Alpin 6 Rating: Good	2	2.3
Barum Polaris 5 Rating: Satisfactory	2.3	3.4
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2023 225/45 R17

Name	Enviromental impact	Driving safety
Best values in test	1,8	2,0
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Rating: Good	1,8	2,6
Michelin ALPIN 6 Rating: Good	1,8	2,3
Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	2,2	3,4
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,8	25,4
Dunlop Winter Sport 5	35,3	26,5
Michelin Alpin 6	34,1	26,4
Barum Polaris 5	37,5	26,9
Sava Eskimo HP2	37,6	26,1
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	2+	2+
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Rating: Exemplary	2	2-	2+	2
Michelin Alpin 6 Rating: Exemplary	2+	2	2+	2+
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2022 215/60 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Rolling resistance	Noise	Wear
Best values in test	2,0	1,8	1,4	1,8	1,5	2,7	1,5
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Rating: Good	2,2	2,4	1,6	2,0	1,7	3,1	2,0
Michelin Alpin 6 Rating: Good	2,4	2,0	2,4	1,9	2,6	2,8	2,0
Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	3,0	2,5	2,3	2,0	1,7	3,5	1,5
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Wear
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+	1
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Rating: Good	2+	2-	2+	2	3+
Michelin Alpin 6 Rating: Exemplary	2	2	2+	2-	1
Barum Polaris 5 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	3+	2+	1-	2+
Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	3	2-	2	2	2+
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2021 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear
Best values in test	1,6	1,9	1,5	2,1	2,7	1,5
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Rating: Good	2,5	2,4	1,5	2,5	3,4	2,5
Michelin Alpin 6 Rating: Good	2,3	2,1	2,4	2,2	3,1	1,5
Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	3,1	3,0	2,2	2,4	4,0	2,5
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,1	27,3
Dunlop Winter Sport 5	33,6	27,3
Michelin Alpin 6	34,9	29,1
Barum Polaris 5	36,1	28,8
Sava Eskimo HP2	36,5	28
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	37,4	28,6
Show test details

Autoexpress Winter tyre test 2020 205/55 R16

Name	Points total	Winter	Wet	Dry	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	101,6	299,9	299,9	100	101,1	100,7
Dunlop Winter Sport 5	97,4	297,2	280,3	92,6	88	100
Michelin Alpin 6	98,4	291,9	295,4	96,2	87,6	98,8
Show test details

Autoklub ČR Winter tyre test 2020 205/55 R16

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	101,1	103,4	102,8	100
Dunlop Winter Sport 5	97,3	96,9	98,5	96,6
Michelin Alpin 6	98,66	97,4	99,2	99,4
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2020 225/55 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	2+	2+	1
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Rating: Good	2+	2	1
Michelin Alpin 6 Rating: Exemplary	2+	2	2
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2020 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	1,3	2,0	1,8	2,1	2,5	1,0	1,8
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Rating: Good	2,3	2,5	2,0	2,3	3,0	1,5	1,8
Michelin Alpin 6 Rating: Good	2,0	2,5	2,1	2,2	2,6	1,5	2,1
Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	3,1	3,1	2,5	2,3	3,0	2,0	1,9
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Rating: Satisfactory	2	3+	1-	2-
Michelin Alpin 6 Rating: Exemplary	2+	2	2+	1-
Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	3	1-	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	29,2	24
Dunlop Winter Sport 5	32,9	24,3
Michelin Alpin 6	30,4	24,7
Barum Polaris 5	33,9	25
Sava Eskimo HP2	33,6	24,1
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	34,8	-
Show test details

Comparison: Dunlop Winter Sport 5 vs. Michelin ALPIN 6 vs. Barum Polaris 5 vs. Sava Eskimo HP2 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands