Segment
1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Premium2. Vredestein Wintrac Pro Premium3. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Upper-middle
Comparison: Dunlop Winter Sport 5 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 vs. Vredestein Wintrac Pro
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Exemplary2. Vredestein Wintrac Pro Exemplary3. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Vredestein Wintrac Pro Recommended2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Recommended3. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Conditionally recommended
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 72 dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 7 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
7
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 30,3 | 24,3 | |||||
| Dunlop Winter Sport 5 | 35,2 | 25 | |||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP71 | 35,7 | 28 | |||||
| Vredestein Wintrac Pro | 33,2 | 24,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
| Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 3+ | 1- | 2- | |||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 2+ | 3+ | 2 | 3 | |||
| Vredestein Wintrac Pro Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2 | 2 | 2- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
| Dunlop Winter Sport 5 | 32,9 | 24,3 | |||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP71 | 31,5 | 24,8 | |||||
| Vredestein Wintrac Pro | 30,8 | 25,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
| Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2 | 2 | 2- | |||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2- | 2 | 2+ | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,2 | 25,9 | |||||
| Dunlop Winter Sport 5 | 33,6 | 27,6 | |||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP71 | 34,8 | 29,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Enviromental impact | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,6 | 9,2 | 9,9 | 10 | |||
| Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Rating: Recommended | 8,9 | 8,5 | 8,9 | 7,3 | |||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Rating: Still recommended | 7,1 | 7,8 | 7,8 | 6,5 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Noise | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 412 | 142 | 127 | 143 | 25 | 10 | |
| Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Rating: Highly recommended | 367 | 112 | 119 | 136 | 22 | 8 | |
| Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 309 | 76 | 108 | 125 | 16 | 9 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
