Segment
1. Dunlop Streetresponse 2 Premium2. Vredestein T-Trac 2 Premium3. Apollo Amazer 4G ECO Lowcost
Comparison: Dunlop Streetresponse 2 vs. Vredestein T-Trac 2 vs. Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Apollo Amazer 4G ECO Satisfactory2. Dunlop Streetresponse 2 Satisfactory3. Vredestein T-Trac 2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Apollo Amazer 4G ECO Satisfactory2. Dunlop Streetresponse 2 Satisfactory3. Vredestein T-Trac 2 Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,5 | 3,0 | 2,0 | 1,6 | ||
| Dunlop Streetresponse 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,6 | 1,8 | 3,6 | 2,5 | 1,9 | ||
| Vredestein T-Trac 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,8 | 2,5 | 3,8 | 2,0 | 1,8 | ||
| Apollo Amazer 4G ECO Rating: Satisfactory | 2,9 | 1,8 | 3,5 | 2,5 | 1,6 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
